<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SJ Cuthbertson &#187; firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wp/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk</link>
	<description>A space for the mind to wander at will</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 12:49:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Notes on gOS</title>
		<link>http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wp/2007/12/notes-on-gos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wp/2007/12/notes-on-gos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wordpress/2007/12/03/notes-on-gos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got around to downloading the ISO of gOS the other day, and had a look. It started up AOK, and reasonably quickly for a liveCD (especially given I&#8217;m still running on just 512kB 512MB RAM), which is reassuring given that it&#8217;s basically just Ubuntu under the hood. I wasn&#8217;t massively enamoured of the look-n-feel, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got around to downloading the ISO of <a href="http://www.thinkgos.com">gOS</a> the other day, and had a look.  It started up AOK, and reasonably quickly for a liveCD (especially given I&#8217;m still running on just <strike>512kB</strike> <em>512MB</em> RAM), which is reassuring given that it&#8217;s basically just Ubuntu under the hood.  I wasn&#8217;t massively enamoured of the look-n-feel, partly because I suspect the graphics were not one of the things on the to-do list for their first release (well, that&#8217;s probably a good thing!).  But it was also my first encounter with Enlightenment desktop &#8211; although difficult to place, it didn&#8217;t really feel as nice as KWin, Compiz or Beryl; but the OS X-like app-launcher bar at the bottom was something I might try to replicate in my Kubuntu installation.  I think it might have been due to the GNOMEyness as well.  Basically, it works and feels OK, <em>IF</em> you&#8217;re more used to Ubuntu than Kubuntu <img src='http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Of course, what&#8217;s really interesting about gOS as an OS (rather than simply as a component of the now-famous $200 Wal-Mart system) is it&#8217;s total reliance on web applications, specifically Google ones.  I was a bit disappointed, to be honest, with how little they&#8217;ve integrated these into the experience &#8211; the icons that relate to web rather than hard-drive based apps (all except for media player and config utils, IIRC) simply open a bog-standard Firefox window at that page, rather than integrating as if it were a desktop app.  Anybody could do this &#8211; sure, it&#8217;d take a little tweaking in places, but for me, it&#8217;s far easier to have one FF window open right from the start of my session, with all the apps/pages I use the most in a bookmarks toolbar, and just go from there.  Being Linux, all the other aspects of it could be fairly easily recreated by apt-get downloading the relevant things, so gOS is certainly not going to be replacing my Kubuntu partition any time soon.  It&#8217;s a brilliant concept, and just right for a dirt-cheap PC bundle that should, hopefully, increase mainstream awareness of Linux in the US &#8211; but poorly executed.</p>
<p>One thing I will say for it &#8211; Firefox sure loads <strong>fast</strong>.  Possibly just because it has no extensions &#8211; but I think it loads even faster than a clean install would on my machine.  Anybody know what they&#8217;ve tweaked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wp/2007/12/notes-on-gos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox Addressbar-clicking hack</title>
		<link>http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wp/2007/10/firefox-addressbar-clicking-hack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wp/2007/10/firefox-addressbar-clicking-hack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[happenings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wordpress/2007/10/23/firefox-addressbar-clicking-hack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will be of most interest to a certain lanky Linux devotee who will hopefully read this; but if you&#8217;ve also been frustrated by the behaviour of Firefox&#8217;s address bar when you click on it, read on. The behaviour I refer to is that when you click on the addressbar, FF normally immediately highlights the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be of most interest to a certain lanky Linux devotee who will hopefully read this; but if you&#8217;ve also been frustrated by the behaviour of Firefox&#8217;s address bar when you click on it, read on.  The behaviour I refer to is that when you click on the addressbar, FF normally immediately highlights the entire line.  If you&#8217;re used to this, OK, but it does go against a pretty widely adopted convention: click once to place the cursor, twice to select the word, and thrice to select the paragraph.  MS Notepad/Wordpad/Write/Word have been doing this since the Dawn of Time &#8482;.  I suspect that&#8217;s also how Mac OS originally implemented cursor clicks in text fields, and it&#8217;s certainly a convention on *nix machines with X.</p>
<p>The fix? Not really even a hack, actually.  In FF&#8217;s about:config screen, change &#8216;browser.urlbar.clickSelectsAll to false.  Restart FF, and voila.  <img src='http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sjcuthbertson.me.uk/wp/2007/10/firefox-addressbar-clicking-hack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
